Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

Accendo Reliability

Reliability Engineering Professional Development
  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Perry Parendo
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Rob’s Reliability Project
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • RCM Blitz®
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Inside FMEA
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Course
    • CRE Preparation Course
    • RAMwright Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Mechanical Level Sensor Types and Use

Mechanical Level Sensor Types and Use

Mechanical Level Sensor Types and Use

In some process situations, mechanical level sensors are the best choice for the environment or are stipulated by law (as in boilers). To operate these devices requires the physical contact of the process being measured. They provide solid indisputable proof that a process condition has been achieved. Provided the mechanical mechanism is connected and working properly, these devices provide the most believable proof that a level in a vessel, tank or silo is actually what the instrument is saying it is.

Keywords: rotating, pendant, vibrating

Mechanical level sensors usually incorporate either a pendant float, a rotating paddle or a vibrating fork. When the process contacts the element a major change in the element’s behaviour is detected and is used to trigger an electrical signal. In the case of a float, it will rise or fall and make or break an electrical contact, a turning paddle will either stop or slow down and change the motor current, and a vibrating fork will change its resonance characteristics.

Drawing No. 1 Common Types of Mechanical Level Switches.
Drawing No. 1 Common Types of Mechanical Level Switches.

These devices do not produce continuous readouts but indicate the presence of the product at the sensor level. Mostly they are used as switches, often as low level and/or high level cutouts. Drawing No. 1 shows three types of mechanical level switches. The length of the detector element can be extended to mount it deeper in the vessel.

One variation to the floating pendant switch is where the float is raised and lowered on a cable. When the float contacts the top of the contents it is buoyed up and the weight on the cable changes. The change in motor current is registered. These devices can be raised and lowered numerous times during filling and emptying and so will act as a means of intermittent level monitoring.

The main limitations of mechanical level switches are that they are in direct contact with the process and can be affected by it. Chemicals can corrode components, product can jam moving parts, materials used in construction and methods of construction can fail due to pressure surges (floats can leak at joints and fill up with process fluid) and moving parts gradually wear. Rough, raging processes and product impact cause mechanical damage to the element, crusting and scale build-up can foul the probe. Internal electrical components can fail from dust, moisture, chemical attack and temperature effects.

The positioning and sensitivity setting of these devices is critical to their successful use in all situations. Mechanical level sensors require physical contact to operate and it is necessary to understand how the contact will occur and affect the position the probe.

In bulk materials silos filled from the center of the roof the product will form a cone out to the walls. A level switch mounted on the wall will not detect the solid product in the cone above it. (Check the type of silo flow on discharge. If there is ‘rat holing’ down through the center or the silo empties as funnel flow then the level switch may indicate incorrect amounts of contents.) If instead a raising/lowering cable sensor were fitted in the center of the silo roof it would detect the top of the contents only. (When specifying the cable lengths of a raising/lowering sensor keep the cable shorter than the distance to the bottom discharge valve. This insures the probe cannot be lowered into the throat and destroyed if the valve is shut.)

Light materials and fluid powders can be easily pushed aside by rotating paddles and vibrating forks. In such cases it is necessary to install larger surface areas that contact a greater amount of product to produce the needed amount of drag.

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer


We (Accendo Reliability) published this article with the kind permission of Feed Forward Publishing, a subsidiary of BIN95.com

Web: www.feedforward.com.au
E-mail: info@feedforward.com.au

If you found this interesting you may like the ebook Centrifugal Pump Problems & Answers.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

« Introducing Program Risk Effects Analysis (PREA)
KISS: A Principle for Proper Project Planning »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series provided curtesy of Feed Forward Publications

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Benefits of Comparing DMAIC with Project Management
  • The Rover Says Good Bye! :(
  • 100% Inspection
  • Don’t Need a Science Project
  • Don’t Forget to Subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates!

© 2019 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service