Supply Management and Context
Abstract
Greg and Fred discuss why today’s business model is often based on managing an organization’s brand and outsourcing design, reliability, and quality.
ᐅ Play Episode
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment
Greg and Fred discuss why today’s business model is often based on managing an organization’s brand and outsourcing design, reliability, and quality.
ᐅ Play Episode
I’m sure you’ve heard it before:
Quality is everyone’s responsibility.
You’ve also heard the terms “quality assurance” and “quality control”. Have you heard of “quality assistance” or “Quality 4.0?
What’s the difference between all of these terms, especially with quality assurance and quality control, the two oldest terms in the list?
As a designer, how are you supposed to interact with these terms? If quality is everyone’s responsibility, then what are yousupposed to do for quality assurance and quality control? Are there different ways you’re supporting each of these ideas inhow you design?
How does quality assistance and Quality 4.0 fit into the design picture?
Let’s explore some official definitions, the changes in quality that led to the quality assistance and Quality 4.0 terms and givesome context of quality with respect to design.
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
We often use probability distributions to help us characterize the likely values a random variable will have. This includes the random variable we call ‘time to failure’ or TTF, which is how long something works before it fails. Failure is a random process, but just because it is random, doesn’t mean it’s unpredictable. Products that wear-in will have vastly different probability distributions for TTF when compare do products that wear-out. So you need to have a good idea of the probability distribution of the TTF of your product when it comes to reliability engineering. But we often see in textbooks and standards the ‘exponential distribution’ simply being assumed as a ‘good’ TTF probability distribution. But is it? And what happens when it isn’t … but you use it anyway? Join this webinar to find out!
[Read more…]
by Mike Konrad Leave a Comment
This episode features three interviews including:
• Gus Mavrou from Seho
• Mark Stansfield from Solderstar
• Jesper Lykke from Viscom
by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment
Greg and Fred discuss work communications and job politics. Greg takes the management point of view. Fred advocates the individual contributor point of view.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss the problems we experience when we are in an organization with very ‘short-term’ thinking. What can we do?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Wim Vancauwenberghe 1 Comment
A significant challenge addressed is managing water losses across a vast network of over 34,000 kilometers of main pipes. Through strategic data use and digital technology implementation, such as sensors and digital customer meters, leakages are detected and managed more efficiently. The episode also highlights the importance of engaging the workforce in the transformation process and emphasizes the significance of data reliability, effective communication, and storytelling in driving organizational change within the water sector.e
by Christopher Jackson 1 Comment
Chris and Fred discuss the challenge of being asked by someone to show (or visualize) stunning, eye-popping results for some reliability activity. How do we do this? Is this possible?
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discuss the advice we would give a engineer just starting a career in Reliability Engineering
ᐅ Play Episode
Ever find yourself stuck trying to gauge the likelihood of an event?
What if you could transform your approach to probability assignments with just one simple trick?
On this episode of Quality During Design, we talk about simplifying probabilities for better decision making. We uncover a method to assign probabilities and occurrence ratings during preliminary assessments.
We share a technique that involves breaking down an event into smaller, more manageable parts, helping you understand and analyze it better. This method makes it easier to assign likelihoods because it provides better understanding of the event, clearer context, and consideration of what may drive things to happen.
Then, we relate these parts to conditional probabilities. We offer example explanations and practical applications to help you grasp conditional probabilities.
Plus, for those looking for additional resources, we have a cheat sheet that can further simplify these concepts for you. Not a subscriber yet? Visit qualityduringdesign.com to sign up and start receiving valuable insights directly in your inbox.
Join us to learn how these techniques can simplify probabilities, improve your assessments, and boost your team’s decision-making.
by Akshay Athalye Leave a Comment
In this episode, I speak with Philip Sage. Today, we’re diving into the murky waters of Mean Time Between Failures, or as some of us like to call it, ‘Maybe This’ll Be Fine’. We’ll uncover why relying on MTBF can sometimes be as risky as trusting your umbrella on a windy day. But don’t worry, we’ve got you covered with some solid alternatives that won’t leave you high and dry!
by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment
Let’s make a comparison. Let’s check our product’s key characteristics against specifications, compare vendor life data, or compare the newest design changes to prior performance. We can and should do comparisons well using the appropriate statistical approach.
Let’s examine a handful of parametric and non-parametric comparison tools, including various hypothesis tests. Plus how to best use these tools and when to set them aside and explore another approach.
by Mike Konrad Leave a Comment
The challenging world of electronics becomes even more challenging when the end product is destined for harsh environments. For high reliability products operating in a harsh environment, the quest for reliability is not just a goal—it’s an imperative. These are not your everyday gadgets; often they’re critical components of systems designed to operate under extreme conditions, where failure is not an option. From the scorching heat of desert landscapes to the unyielding cold of arctic tundras, from the high-pressure depths of our oceans to the radiation-filled expanse of space, the demands on these electronic products are as varied as the environments themselves.
While ocean depths, outer space, and frozen tundras are arguably harsh environments, we don’t have to look too far for examples of product failures in less harsh environments. One example that comes to mind is the state of public EV charging stations. Government reports have concluded that up to 25% of public EV chargers are at any given time.
While there are many reasons for this, one may conclude they are not designed and manufactured for the intended in climactic operating environment.
On this episode, we’ll uncover the numerous challenges that designers and engineers face in their quest for reliability, durability, and functionality of the final product.
As we navigate through this complex landscape, we’ll highlight the strategies that enable these products to not just survive, but excel in unforgiving conditions.
Kirk and Fred discuss reliability allocations for individual components and subsystems.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss how short, 1-minute explainer videos could help reliability engineers … especially new ones!
ᐅ Play Episode