Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

We worked on a project with our team and met our goal!
Except, management isn’t happy – they expected something else.

Seeing if we have alignment on goals is easy if we gather the team and stakeholders for 10 minutes and use a continuum.

There are certain categories that goals will fall within. A continuum is a way we can list those categories, get alignment, and gain an understanding of how ‘big’ of a project this is going to be. We get clarity on our goals.

Is it hard? Not at all. Is it eye-opening? Sometimes. It can help us move forward with a discussion to help ensure we’re all successful.

 

View the Episode Transcript

A continuum is a quick, visual way to get alignment about project goals.

If we think there’s the slightest chance that there could be misinterpretation in a project or task goal, then we have a quick meeting with our team and stakeholders.

We can make it a formal meeting or use it as a quick check. You can also make it part of the project charter. Remotely, you can do this using a whiteboard or a polling app.

 Purpose: Make sure that everyone understands the goal in the same way and edit the goal, if needed.

Agenda: Individually compare our goal objective against a continuum. Edit the goal, if needed.

Attendees: project team and stakeholders

  1. Write down the goal (as currently stated) for everyone to see.
  2. Draw out a continuum.
  3. Ask each attendee to mark where they think this project lies on the continuum.
  4. If there’s a disconnect, facilitate the team and the stakeholders through editing the description of the goal.

Keep it simple! Like many quality tools, this is a visual way to standardize the communication across a team. It helps the team and stakeholders have individual input and to understand what everyone else is thinking. The ultimate goal is to move ahead in the project with confidence – quickly.

Citations:

Other Quality during Design podcast episodes you might like:

Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

Use Meetings to Add Productivity

How can 8D help solve my recurring problem?

 

Episode Transcript

We were assigned to a group and given a task, improve the customer service of the widget product by at least 10% within three months. Sounds good. It’s SMART: specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and time-bound. So we set to work and we improve the overall customer service of the widget product by 12%, and we do it within three months. We updated the process so that customer service can now handle 12% more service calls per hour.

However, management isn’t happy about it. What do you mean? We improved the customer service of the widget? Product management wanted customer service to improve their interaction with the customer. They wanted to see an improvement in the customer survey response ratings.

So we improved the process. Management wanted us to improve the service. And those are two different things. Sounds like a simple mix-up, but it happens. Instead of pointing fingers, we can take a moment with our team and the stakeholders to do just a clarity check and we can use a continuum to do it. Sound complicated? It’s not, but it brings to light quickly a disconnect (if there is one) and when there’s a disconnect, we can work it out so that we’re working on the proper things. Let’s talk more about a continuum, what it is and how we use it, after this brief introduction.

Hello and welcome to Quality During Design, the place to use quality thinking to create products others love for less. Each week we talk about ways to use quality during design, engineering, and product development. My name is Dianna Deeney. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join us. Visit quality during design.com.

Do you know what 12 things you should have before a design concept makes it to the engineering drawing board? I’ve put together a free checklist and a mini training module. You can sign up for it at quality during design.com/programs/twelve things or click the link on the homepage.

A continuum. It’s spelled with two U’s at the end. Picture a number line, a horizontal line with tick marks on it. But now instead of numbers, we have words and those words describe the scope of a goal. There are five basic scopes of goals or things that we work on.

We can work on a task or a plan, meaning that we’re being tasked with getting something done. We’re not making changes or improvements. Just do this.

Our goal could be related to a problem: to solving a problem.

Or our goal could be related to a product where we need to make a change or make an improvement to a product.

Our goal could be related to a process where we need to make a change or improve an existing process.

Our goal could be service oriented. Something is being done as a service and we’re being asked to make it better. We can change or improve the existing service or break out and completely do something new.

So we have the task (or plan), the problem, product, process, and service as categories that we can use to describe any project or goal that we’re working on. Now, just because it happens, we’re going to add another tick mark to our horizontal continuum and put “ALL”, which means you’ve got a big project on your hands.

This continuum is a sliding scale. We’re going to have a slider on the top of it. That slider will likely be located above one of the tick marks. Our goal is to do a task, solve a problem, improve a product, and so on.

We’re working with a continuum here, which means that there is a progression of values along our continuum line. When we are looking at ALL and everything, that is a big project, it’s going to take a while, there’s a lot of effort involved. On the other end of our scale when we’re implementing a plan, we have a pretty narrow and limited focus, and the scope of our goal can lie on either ends or anywhere in between. If our slider ends up closer to the ALL end of our continuum, then it’s going to require more effort.

After we’ve drawn this continuum somewhere on a whiteboard or a virtual whiteboard, we’re going to get our team and stakeholders together for 10 minutes and make sure that we’ve got the right information and that we’re all on the same page with respect to the goal. We’re also going to write the project goal or mission statement where everyone can see it.

Now, we’re going to ask each team member and each stakeholder to add their slider or marker along the continuum where they think this project should be located. Is this project related to a task or a plan that we’re just getting something done? Are we solving a problem? Are we improving a product? Are we improving an existing process? Does this have to do with a service or are we looking at the whole thing?

In our example, our team would’ve put their markers over the PROCESS. Management would’ve put it over SERVICE. In less than five minutes, we all would’ve seen the disconnect.

Then what do we do about it? We work it out. We work together to fix the goal or a mission statement, rewriting it so that the team and stakeholders are on the same page with what the project is supposed to be doing. If there is no disconnect and the goal statement is clearly understood and it’s a SMART goal, then we’re good to go.

If we want to take it a step further, we could evaluate it against an ACORN test, which is another way of looking at goals to make sure they’re well defined. We’ll end up with a SMART ACORN goal. We covered that in an earlier podcast episode. I’ll link to that episode on the blog.

On this continuum, our slider can land between tick marks. We could have two sliders. We’re not boxed in here with the sliders and we’re not boxed into lots of acronyms to check our goal setting either. We should keep it simple but do what we need to do to communicate.

What’s today’s insight to action? A continuum is a quick visual way to get alignment about project goals. If we think there’s the slightest chance that there could be misinterpretation in a project or task goal, then we take five minutes with our groups, draw out a continuum and make sure that everyone is expecting the same thing. If not, we can facilitate the team and the stakeholders through editing the description of the goal. It doesn’t take a lot of time to do. If there is a misalignment between expectations and what’s delivered, it saves in many costs in the long run.

If you like this topic or the content in this episode, there’s much more on our website, including information about how to join our signature coaching program, the Quality during Design Journey. Consistency is important, so subscribe to the weekly newsletter. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening!

 

Filed Under: Quality during Design

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Recent Episodes

QDD 102 Get Design Inputs with Flowcharts

QDD 101 Quality Tools are Legos of Development (and Their 7 Uses)

QDD 100 Lessons Learned from Coffee Pod Stories

QDD 099 Crucial Conversations in Engineering, with Shere Tuckey (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 098 Challenges Getting Team Input in Concept Development

QDD 097 Brainstorming within Design Sprints

QDD 096 After the ‘Storm: Compare and Prioritize Ideas

QDD 095 After the ‘Storm: Pareto Voting and Screening Methods

QDD 094 After the ‘Storm: Group and Explore Ideas

QDD 093 Product Design with Brainstorming, with Emily Haidemenos (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 092 Ways to Gather Ideas with a Team

QDD 091 The Spirits of Technical Writing Past, Present, and Future

QDD 090 The Gifts Others Bring

QDD 089 Next Steps after Surprising Test Results

QDD 088 Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

QDD 086 Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development

QDD 085 Book Cast

QDD 084 Engineering in the Color Economy

QDD 083 Getting to Great Designs

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

QDD 081 Variable Relationships: Correlation and Causation

QDD 080 Use Meetings to Add Productivity

QDD 079 Ways to Partner with Test Engineers

QDD 078 What do We do with FMEA Early in Design Concept?

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

QDD 076 Use Force Field Analysis to Understand Nuances

QDD 075 Getting Use Information without a Prototype

QDD 074 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Supplements Test

QDD 073 2 Lessons about Remote Work for Design Engineers

QDD 072 Always Plot the Data

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

QDD 070 Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing

QDD 069 Use FMEA to Choose Critical Design Features

QDD 068 Get Unstuck: Expand and Contract Our Problem

QDD 067 Get Unstuck: Reframe our Problem

QDD 066 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 065 Prioritizing Technical Requirements with a House of Quality

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

QDD 063 Product Design from a Data Professional Viewpoint, with Gabor Szabo (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 062 How Does Reliability Engineering Affect (Not Just Assess) Design?

QDD 061 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 060 3 Tips for Planning Design Reviews

QDD 059 Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 058 UFMEA vs. DFMEA

QDD 057 Design Input & Specs vs. Test & Measure Capability

QDD 056 ALT vs. HALT

QDD 055 Quality as a Strategic Asset vs. Quality as a Control

QDD 054 Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

QDD 053 Internal Customers vs. External Customers

QDD 052 Discrete Data vs. Continuous Data

QDD 051 Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

QDD 050 Try this Method to Help with Complex Decisions (DMRCS)

QDD 049 Overlapping Ideas: Quality, Reliability, and Safety

QDD 048 Using SIPOC to Get Started

QDD 047 Risk Barriers as Swiss Cheese?

QDD 046 Environmental Stress Testing for Robust Designs

QDD 045 Choosing a Confidence Level for Test using FMEA

QDD 044 Getting Started with FMEA – It All Begins with a Plan

QDD 043 How can 8D help Solve my Recurring Problem?

QDD 042 Mistake-Proofing – The Poka-Yoke of Usability

QDD 041 Getting Comfortable with using Reliability Results

QDD 040 How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

QDD 039 Choosing Quality Tools (Mind Map vs. Flowchart vs. Spaghetti Diagram)

QDD 038 The DFE Part of DFX (Design For Environment and eXcellence)

QDD 037 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 036 When to use DOE (Design of Experiments)?

QDD 035 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 034 Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 033 How Many Do We Need To Test?

QDD 032 Life Cycle Costing for Product Design Choices

QDD 031 5 Aspects of Good Reliability Goals and Requirements

QDD 030 Using Failure Rate Functions to Drive Early Design Decisions

QDD 029 Types of Design Analyses possible with User Process Flowcharts

QDD 028 Design Tolerances Based on Economics (Using the Taguchi Loss Function)

QDD 027 How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

QDD 026 Solving Symptoms Instead of Causes?

QDD 025 Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

QDD 024 Why Look to Standards

QDD 023 Getting the Voice of the Customer

QDD 022 The Way We Test Matters

QDD 021 Designing Specs for QA

QDD 020 Every Failure is a Gift

QDD 019 Understanding the Purposes behind Kaizen

QDD 018 Fishbone Diagram: A Supertool to Understand Problems, Potential Solutions, and Goals

QDD 017 What is ‘Production Equivalent’ and Why Does it Matter?

QDD 016 About Visual Quality Standards

QDD 015 Using the Pareto Principle and Avoiding Common Pitfalls

QDD 014 The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

QDD 013 When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 012 What are TQM, QFD, Six Sigma, and Lean?

QDD 011 The Designer’s Important Influence on Monitoring After Launch

QDD 010 How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 009 About Using Slide Decks for Technical Design Reviews

QDD 008 Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds.

QDD 007 Need to innovate? Stop brainstorming and try a systematic approach.

QDD 006 HALT! Watch out for that weakest link

QDD 005 The Designer’s Risk Analysis affects Business, Projects, and Suppliers

QDD 004 A big failure and too many causes? Try this analysis.

QDD 003 Why Your Design Inputs Need to Include Quality & Reliability

QDD 002 My product works. Why don’t they want it?

QDD 001 How to Choose the Right Improvement Model

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.