Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » You searched for Change Management » Page 30

Search Results for: Change Management

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 132 Driving Effective Conversations-Three Major Aspects to Consider for DfX

QDD 132 Driving Effective Conversations-Three Major Aspects to Consider for DfX

Driving Effective Conversations-Three Major Aspects to Consider for DfX

Gain insights into working effectively with cross-functional teams, collecting invaluable design inputs without succumbing to the overwhelming flow of information.

We’ll discuss the magic behind the ‘concept space’, an efficient approach to dissect potential customer experiences, streamlining concept development at the start.

What about after that high-level concept development, when we begin our engineering design?

Early engineering diagrams can prove instrumental in evaluating modularity, layout, and interactions in product design with a team. Dianna guides us through part of a Quality During Design course lesson, shedding light on how these diagrams can be used. Each function has a different reason to look at these three aspects of product design, and it’s worth asking to help us achieve Design for Excellence.

Learn how the collective wisdom of these teams can influence design choices, ensuring that the final product appeases both the internal and external customers. So, buckle up for this enlightening episode as we demystify product design and stress the crucial role of a synchronized team effort.

[Read more…]

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Workplace Risk Assessments Need to be Visual

Workplace Risk Assessments Need to be Visual

Now SFAIRP is the Criterion to Judge If You have Sufficiently Controlled Your Workplace Hazards

Risk Assessment Used to be Based on ALARP to Decide if Workplace Hazards were Sufficiently Controlled, But Today You Need to Use SFAIRP

The original OHS risk assessment process, procedures and techniques identified hazards; assessed risk; established risk controls; reduced and managed risks to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ (ALARP), but safety laws are now changing to ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ (SFAIRP) [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Sanjeev Saraf 1 Comment

The Next Attack

The Next Attack

For the month of September, I thought it would be appropriate to write a post on Terrorism Risks.

Since 2001, there have been an average of 5 attempted terror attacks annually in the U.S. that have resulted in arrests, trial, or raising of the DHS threat level. Now you know what changes the threat level at the airport.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Risk & Safety, Operational Risk Process Safety

by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

Reliability happens at the point of DECISION

Reliability doesn’t just happen. Following standards, doing what worked 10 years ago or any other approach to reliability engineering that doesn’t focus on what your system is today won’t make reliability happen.

Fault trees are great at modeling system reliability. They are one of several tools that can help you turn what you know about component or subsystem failure characteristics into an understanding of system reliability characteristics. Which lets you measure reliability.

But measuring reliability is one thing. Improving reliability is a much bigger thing.

Good reliability decisions are based on 
knowing HOW your system will fail

Fault trees are a great Root Cause Analysis (RCA) tool. They can really help you and your team identify the potential causes of failure, which then focuses your investigation on what really happened.

But it is much better to prevent failures from occurring. Making your first design a reliable design means you need to know how your system will fail … from the first day of design.

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a great 
tool for working this out

This course is one of the few courses I have ever done that has actually made me want to come back and do more reliability engineering courses. The animations are fantastic, there are not thousands of equations, and I felt like I understood why I needed to learn each topic before I started. I cannot recommend this course enough!

— David (rail industry)

Get started with Fault Tree Analysis today

Enroll in the Fault Tree Analysis course.

If you have already signed up for the course, log in and enjoy.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Course Description and Overview

The 4-hour, 11-module Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) Course teaches you how to use fault trees to achieve important outcomes supporting reliability performance.

Fault trees are visual representation methodologies that represent our understanding of how faults progress to a state of failure. 

Fault trees can be used to model system reliability where the reliability performance characteristics of components are used to determine system reliability performance characteristics. This allows us to model Time to Failure (TTF) at a system level if we have a good understanding of component TTF. This can then be used to inform things like warranty period determination or reliability at any point in usage.

Fault trees can also be used from the perspective of Root Cause Analysis (RCA). This usually occurs when we have observed a failure (or undesirable event) and want to ‘collectively brainstorm’ a series of explanations as to why it occurred. Fault trees used in this way can be used to identify likely ‘root causes’ that can either be the subject of further investigation or be designed out of the system. Fault trees used in this context support ‘reliability improvement’ more than ‘reliability measurement.’ 

Fault trees in this way can be used in a fundamentally more valuable context where we focus on preventing problems like failure before they occur. Fault trees used in this way are often parts of larger proactive reliability engineering activities like Failure Mode and Effects Analyses (FMEAs). If failure is defined as any event where we fail to meet our customer or user expectations, fault trees can help us do robust, customer-centric design. This is where we prioritize what features matter the most to our customers, and we incorporate really simple design changes very early in the production lifecycle to become or remain an industry leader.

Students who design, manufacture, or need to otherwise manage any sort of product or equipment will benefit from this course. FTA can be used for modeling TTF and informing key business plan decisions. FTA can be used to identify root causes of failure – both in the past and in the future. This means that FTA can be used to prevent problems, including issues that may introduce production costs and delays. FTA can be used to identify the VITAL FEW problems and issues our product, systems or services need to focus on.

Medium or Delivery Mode

This FTA Course is made up of 

11 lessons

that take you through the fundamentals of FTA, broken down into ‘three’ perspectives: system reliability modeling; RCA; and robust customer-centric design. These modules are based on an example that is iteratively developed throughout the course, with students completing exercises and questions in the workbook.

There is a total of 

4 hours of lessons.

This course will be delivered through

Self-paced video lessons.

So, regardless of where you find yourself in life, you 
will be able to do this course when it suits you.

Here is what you get. You get

1-year access

There will always be new developments in reliability engineering, and we will keep finding better ways to tell the story. 
So, as we make module updates, you will continue to get access to the course for one year from the date of purchase.

Then there is

 Ongoing expert Q&A.

I will be available to answer your questions for 12 months after completion of the course. See the course Materials tab to find contact options.

Who is your teacher? Dr. Chris Jackson

Dr Jackson holds a Ph.D. and MSc in Reliability Engineering from the University of Maryland’s Center of Risk and Reliability. He also holds a BE in Mechanical Engineering, a Masters of Military Science from the Australian National University (ANU) and has substantial experience in the field of leadership, management, risk, reliability and maintainability. He is a Certified Reliability Engineer (CRE) through the American Society of Quality (ASQ) and a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng) through Engineers Australia.

Dr Jackson is an Accendo Reliability Thought Leader. Was the inaugural director of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA’s) Center of Reliability and Resilience Engineering and the founder of its Center for the Safety and Reliability of Autonomous Systems (SARAS). He has had an extensive career as a Senior Reliability Engineer in the Australian Defence Force and is the Director of Acuitas Reliability Pty Ltd.

He has supported many complex and material systems to develop their reliability performance and assisted in providing reliability management frameworks that support business outcomes (that is, making more money). He has been a reliability management consultant to many companies across industries ranging from medical devices to small satellites. He has also led initiatives in complementary fields such as systems engineering and performance-based management frameworks (PBMFs). He is the author of two reliability engineering books, a co-author of another, and several journal articles and conference papers.

What you will receive

Access to all 4 hours of lesson videos

The comprehensive electronic course notes are an interactive PDF document that allows you to take notes using your computer or tablet.

Direct access to Chris for questions about the course content or its application.

Technical support for any issue accessing or viewing the course content from Accendo Reliability.

Student Learning Objectives

Students who complete this course will be able to do the following:

  • Describe fault trees and how they are constructed
  • Understand the different perspectives from which fault trees are used and how this affects their employment
  • Identify which decisions may benefit from FTA, and which perspective is relevant
  • Construct fault trees that model system reliability
  • Understand ‘logic gates’ and how they are included in a fault tree
  • Understand basic system reliability configurations that include parallel, series, ‘k out of n’ configurations
  • Integrate fault trees with other modeling methodologies including Reliability Block Diagrams (RBDs), success trees, Event Trees (ETs) and other fault trees
  • Analyze system reliability using a fault tree system reliability model and component reliability performance characteristics
  • Model basic dependent failure scenarios including Common Cause Failure
  • Understand the different redundancy configurations represented by fault tree ‘AND’ gates that include load sharing and switching systems
  • List key limitations of FTA software
  • Construct a fault tree that models ‘causality’ to help identify potential root causes of failure (both past and future)
  • Identify potential root causes of observed failure using FTA (as part of RCA)
  • Identify potential root causes of potential failure using FTA (as part of FMEA)
  • Design robust, customer-centric products, systems and services using FTA based on customer expectation
  • Understand system ‘cut sets’ and how they relate to reliability performance characteristics
  • Identify ‘cut sets’ from a fault tree that models system reliability
  • Create FTA strategies that efficiently and effectively using teams (as part of a group activity)
  • List the pros of FTA to help identify when fault trees can support a specific decision
  • List the cons of FTA to help identify when fault trees can NOT support a specific decision

Learning Resouces

All students will need to have a computer or laptop with speakers, a microphone and the capability of hosting Zoom TM video conferencing software. You will also need to prepare yourself to be an ‘online student’ and make sure that wherever you are, you have set yourself up for learning. More help can be found at the How to be a Successful Online Student page.

You should have a pen and note-taking paper. You do not need any textbooks to undertake this course, but if you are interested in learning more about reliability engineering, then we recommend Reliability Engineering and Management.  

You will also need access to Microsoft PowerPoint for a class exercise. You will be required to overlay certain statistical plots as part of a class exercise.

We also highly recommend becoming a member at accendoreliability.com. This is a free resource with podcasts, webinars, articles and books that can help you remain up to date with reliability engineering developments. 

There is no assessment or exam you have to pass in order to complete this course.

by Mike Konrad Leave a Comment

RM 129: Network Reliability – Avoiding Cyber-Security Threats

RM 129: Network Reliability – Avoiding Cyber-Security Threats

Network Reliability – Avoiding Cyber-Security Threats

We talk almost exclusively about reliability on this show. Specifically, reliability of circuit assemblies. We discuss production best practices, design for manufacturing and reliability. Failure analysis, and more. We’ve reviewed the latest tends in industry 4.0, the connectivity of machine to machine and machine to management. We discussed big data and how to make all of our newly acquired data relevant and actionable. For all this to occur, our computers must function properly. They must preform the assigned tasks and communicate large sums of data. What happens to our production line if the computers stop functioning? What would happen if our network ceases to operate?

We’ve all witnessed the airline industry grind to a halt recently due to computer failures and connectivity issues. The fact is, very few industries can function properly or even at all if the computer systems fail.

I’m not referring to quality issues within the computer or network’s internal circuit assemblies. I’m referring to malware, ransomware, and other nefarious actions brought on hackers with the intent to disrupt companies, industries, and governments, frequently with the goal of returning (or promising to return) your own data in exchange for an exorbitant payment.

Our industry, like many others is completely dependent on computers and connectivity. Without ether, most production lines will simply sit idle.

How can we avoid this terrifying scenario? How do hackers gain access to our computers and networks? How can we add reliability to our computer and network policies and procedures? To answer these and other related questions, I invited a network security expert on the show. Adrian Francoz, co-founder and CEO of Zeta Sky, a managed IT support and cyber security services company lives in the world of cyber security. He and his company protect their customer’s networks through the implementation of security best practices and constant training, both for his customers, and for his own staff. After all, as I speak, hackers and other bad actors are hard at work searching for the next scam, vulnerability, and the opportunity to score a huge payday, all at our expense.

In the Southern California area? Consider attending the inland Empire cyber security summit on Thursday, October 26 at the Chaffey College InTech Center, 9400 Cherry Ave, Bldg A Fontana, CA 92335.

Register here:

Inland Empire Cyber Security Summit 2023

Adrian’s Contact Information:
info@zetasky.com
https://www.zetasky.com

[Read more…]

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Projects Emergencies: Response or Reaction

Projects Emergencies: Response or Reaction

Guest Post by Malcolm Peart (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

In project management we can’t always be in control of the environment around us.  We can only forecast rather than predict risk and despite our ‘reasonable’ or even ‘best’ efforts to mitigate risk; shit happens and emergencies ensue!  It’s not just physical emergencies but also those related to time and cost; remember overbudget or late projects can create an emergency for shareholders and stakeholders alike.

Maybe it’s because we tend to look at the ‘big risks’ or the ‘top ten’ after some semiquantitative assessment but then fail to consider that risks can change with time as more information becomes available.  Or, maybe it is because only those risks that can be clearly defined and are ‘likely’ are communicated to the eyes and ears on the ground.  Those low probability, high impact risks can tend to slip under any risk radar.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

Rich Nave

Rich Nave

Rich Nave

Richard is a Senior Consultant and Training Facilitator at The Luminous Group.  Having more than 25 years of experience in Product Development, Program Management and Manufacturing Management, Rich has a proven record of success bringing new technical knowledge to clients. Combining his mechanical engineering background with his broad knowledge of the global automotive industry, Rich has become an expert in Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) and Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA).  

Over the past few years, Rich has learned and now coaches many clients in the AIAG & VDA FMEA methodology for both Process and Design applications.

Rich has a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. His friendly, but no-nonsense approach make him immediately effective in defining issues, developing solutions and implementing change.  When not working with clients, Rich trains for and runs multiple Ultramarthons each year.


At The Luminous Group, we believe people are your greatest asset —and well-designed processes are your strongest tools. We take a people-focused approach to process improvement strategy, training, and process audits to help auto industry suppliers and other manufacturers see and solve complex problems—and hold every inch they gain.

Learn more about The Luminous Group.


FMEA 101

This class provides an online learning opportunity to grasp the fundamentals of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Richard is the primary contact for the course.

Learn more about the FMEA 101 course.

Greg Christensen

Image of Greg Christensen behind the mic

Greg Christensen is the host of CMMSradio, a podcast about all things CMMS (computerized maintenance management software), and consultant leaning on his 3+ decades in CMMS, FM, Maintenance Management, and the like. After 1000’s of demos, even more client interactions and projects, and numerous deployments. Co-founder and VP of CMMS (successful exit 2018), relentlessly pursuing the “elusive win-win,” the podcast helps even more companies and people navigate their CMMS journey with expert guests, inspiring monologues, and a no-nonsense approach that is real, raw, and relatable. If you have a CMMS project and want some insights – Connect with Greg and follow CMMSradio on your favorite podcasting medium. He’s passionate about the space – ALL of it – and loves to help solve problems.


logo for the podcast CMMSradio

CMMSradio

Greg is the host of the podcast CMMSradio.

All things CMMS, Computerized Maintenance Management Software, including guidance on CMMS selection and use, best practices, industry experts, system providers, and more. This podcast is for you If you’re considering or looking for a CMMS, want to know more about facilities and maintenance management systems, need to improve how you use your current CMMS, need ideas on better user adoption strategies, or are considering making a change to a new CMMS – You know, a lift-and-shift. We’ll bring in experts to help guide us along the way. We’re here to help you have a successful CMMS journey.

Follow the show via Linkedin or via the CMMSradio website.


Greg’s archive lists contributions of articles and episodes.

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Risk

Recorded webinars on the topic of  Risk

Risk is Uncertainty in the Outcome

Risk exists since we cannot foresee the future very well. How will AI change our jobs and life? How well will the product launch go? Will the outcome of our decision be as expected?

Risk and risk management is the endeavor to identify, prioritize, and address risks in order to minimize the uncertainty of desired outcomes. There are many methods that we can employ within a risk management framework.

These webinars related to risk explore what risk is and best practices to identify and address risks. The webinars also closely examine topics that currently pose significant risks.

Webinars on Value

The right sidebar contains a collection of webinars in chronological order of the original event date.

After viewing an event, click the Mark Complete button, resulting in a green checkmark in the navigation menu.

These webinars intend to create value. If you learn and use the concepts and ideas in these webinars, you will create value. Please let us know how you apply the information provided or if you have any questions.

by Greg Hutchins 2 Comments

Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

Guest Post by John Ayers (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

The majority of companies today outsource a major portion (up to 60-70%) of their work scope to subcontractors.  As a result, the subcontractors become a risk to your project because you have no direct control over them. For example, if they start to slip their schedule you cannot direct them to put more assets on the job to pull the schedule back. The other risk that is not obvious is that posed by your subcontractors major vendors or subcontractors. To illustrate this point, this article describes a story that I was personally involved in. 

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Operator Error?

An “Inside FMEA” reader recently asked a question on the subject of Process FMEAs, specifically whether assigning the cause as “operator error” is useful. This article will share insights into the nature of a cause in Process FMEA, and whether describing cause as “operator error” adds value.

Fred and I podcasted on this topic. Link to the podcast is here.

I’ve seen literally hundreds of Process FMEAs that list “operator error” as the cause of a process related failure mode. Let me be as clear as I can. Assigning “operator error” as the cause in a Process FMEA does not add value. I’ll explain. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques Tagged With: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

by Robert (Bob) J. Latino 1 Comment

RCA: Going From Good to Great

RCA: Going From Good to Great

I’ve been in the Reliability and RCA space now for 38 years now (yes, I’m old 😊), but recently I’ve had a major change in perspective. For 37 of those years my family owned and ran a business (Reliability Center, Inc) that offered training, consulting, and software in the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) space. We developed and created the PROACT® RCA Methodology & Software which has been adopted by many Fortune 500 and Global 1000 companies. However, in 2019, we enacted succession plans as we (my brothers, sisters, and I) approached retirement ages. We sold RCI in 2019. 

NOW comes the perspective change, I am not an RCA provider anymore who is beholden to a proprietary brand, but I’m now an RCA consumer with deep domain knowledge of what the core principles of effective RCA are. In this paper, I would like to remove the RCA provider brand labels, and delve into ‘What makes any RCA effort, good versus great?” When we remove the labels and look at any investigative occupation, all the steps are basically the same. So, let’s explore together!

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Systems Thinking, The RCA

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

The Future of Reliability Engineering

The Future of Reliability Engineering

Guest Post by Carl Carlson (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

Destiny is no matter of chance. It is a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.” – William Jennings Bryan

The Oxford English dictionary defines “reliability” as “the quality of being able to be trusted to do what somebody wants or needs.”

The textbook definition for “reliability” is “the probability that an item will perform its intended function for a designated period of time without failure under specified operating and environmental conditions.”

In this article, I will share a brief outline of the current and future state of reliability engineering, what works and doesn’t work, and why it matters to all of us.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Maintenance Planning From Condition Monitoring Reports

Maintenance Planning From Condition Monitoring Reports

How to use Condition Monitoring Reports to do Maintenance Planning of the Maintenance Work Activities that will prevent Equipment Failure

This article by Peter Brown, a vibration analysis condition monitoring expert, explains how to address and action condition monitoring reports from your condition monitoring service provider.

Abstract

Maintenance Planning From Condition Monitoring Reports.  Having developed the finest condition monitoring programme that provides all the data required to predict plant behaviour it is now necessary to convert that data into information and to plan it in for action by the maintenance team at a time that is compatible with operations.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Dianna Deeney 1 Comment

SOR 898 ERM and Reliability Engineers

SOR 898 ERM and Reliability Engineers

ERM and Reliability Engineers

Abstract

Dianna and Greg discussing ERM and Reliability Engineers, along with the AI revolution and the current state of quality.
ᐅ Play Episode

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • …
  • 77
  • Next Page »
Get Weekly Email Updates
The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

Please login to have full access.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.