Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles

Articles

Find all articles across all article series listed in reverse chronological order.

by Ayaz Bayramov 1 Comment

RAM Analysis: The Sweet Spot of Systems Engineering

RAM Analysis: The Sweet Spot of Systems Engineering

Newton’s 3rd Law and Systems Thinking are two of the most important concepts every engineer needs to understand deeply. I hear you saying, “Come on, Ayaz, which engineer does not know about Newton’s 3rd Law?”

My response? Quite a lot.

I am not talking about memorizing the formula and applying it in a calculation. I am talking about truly understanding its philosophy. It is a philosophy that explains the nature of interrelated, complex systems. There is no absolute win in this world. We live in a complex reality where everything, literally everything, is connected.

Do you remember the concept of the Butterfly Effect? It is the idea that a small change in one place, like a butterfly flapping its wings in the Savanna, can eventually cause a tornado somewhere else. It illustrates that a change in one part of a system inevitably causes a change in another part. Good engineering is to be aware of these impacts and manage them.

Engineering works the same way. You push on one parameter, and another one reacts.

In the world of reliability and maintainability, we have a concept called RAM (Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability) analysis. It fits perfectly into the systems thinking mindset because it forces us to find a reasonable balance between competing demands.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Breaking Bad for Reliability, on Product Reliability Tagged With: engineering trade-offs, RAM analysis, systems thinking

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How to Choose Performance Indicators That Actually Drive Success

How to Choose Performance Indicators That Actually Drive Success

The idea of anything worth doing is worth measuring is a persistent one. The persistent problem is that measuring performance becomes much more difficult as we move into the realms of strategic plans, management systems, and reliability programs. In many cases, choosing performance indicators and measures is less about choosing new ones and more about realignment and refinement of old ones. However, in some cases, it’s simply better to retool. These are a few considerations for getting started. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: dashboards, performance measures

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Failure Happens – It Is What Happens Next That Matters

Failure Happens – It Is What Happens Next That Matters

One of the benefits of reliability engineering is that failure happens.

Everything made, manufactured, or assembled will fail at some point. It is our desire to have items last long enough that keep working for us. Since failures happen, our work includes dealing with failures.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

R99 vs. 1 ppm

R99 vs. 1 ppm

Achieving 99% reliability versus 99.9999% reliability (1 part per million failure rate) represents a massive leap in quality and performance, especially for electromechanical devices in the automotive and aviation industries. The efforts required to reach these levels of reliability differ significantly:

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

 Developing Maintenance Strategy for a Sheet of Paper 

 Developing Maintenance Strategy for a Sheet of Paper 

 How do you work-out the right life-cycle maintenance strategies? Does one strategy apply throughout an asset’s life? What influences the choices and decisions as to what maintenance to do and when it should be done? How much money and resources do you expend in the maintenance of an asset? To keep the concepts behind these important questions on maintenance strategy selection simple they are applied to a sheet of paper.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Automating Risk Management

Automating Risk Management

Guest Post by Alex Sidorenko (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

In the last 2 years my team was involved in automating risk management part for investment decision making, vendor accreditation, market risk, tender process, treasury management, credit risk and project management. That’s 8 different software packages selected from dozens of possible options. In this article I wanted to share some important takeaways from our risk management automation.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

by Nancy Regan Leave a Comment

Do Reliability Centered Maintenance Working Groups Really Guess?

Do Reliability Centered Maintenance Working Groups Really Guess?

RCM Myth Busting: Truth Revealed!

True or False? Do Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Working Group members guess during an RCM analysis?

In this video, I dive into a common misconception about Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis. While it is often wrongly believed that RCM Working Group members take guesses, the reality is quite different. Thanks to their in-depth knowledge of the equipment and its operating environment, they are well-prepared to answer most of the questions posed by the RCM Facilitator.

But what happens when a Working Group doesn’t have all the answers? The RCM Facilitator is trained to recognize when additional information is needed. When that happens, the Failure Mode is put on hold, and an action item is raised to ensure the right data is gathered before proceeding.

Watch this video to learn how RCM analysis is designed to prioritize thoroughness, ensuring that every decision is based on solid information.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Everyday RCM, on Maintenance Reliability

by Hemant Urdhwareshe Leave a Comment

Computer Generated and General Full Factorial Designs using Minitab

Computer Generated and General Full Factorial Designs using Minitab

Dear friends, we are very happy to release our 100th technical video on the subject of Computer generated Optimal experimental designs!

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Institute of Quality & Reliability, on Tools & Techniques

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

Six Powerful Communication Resources for Reliability Engineers

Six Powerful Communication Resources for Reliability Engineers

Reliability professionals need clear communication when presenting to senior leaders. Yet as technical experts, most of us haven’t been trained for these high-stakes moments. We know our material inside and out, but struggle to make it resonate with executives who think differently. The Tackle Shop at JD Solomon Solutions offers practical resources, tools, and guidance to help bridge the communication gap and ensure your message captures the attention of senior leaders. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: collaboration, communication, Facilitation, FINESSE fishbone diagram, Resources

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

The Dirge of the MTBF Bias

The Dirge of the MTBF Bias

We use our biases every day to make choices.

We select the beige sweater because we have a color bias concerning our sweaters.

Many of our biases help us quickly make decisions. We rely on biases to move through the day. Many of our biases are under the surface, unconsciously guiding our daily decisions. Mostly, biases are good or at least inconsequential.

The problem is the bias that shields us from achieving our goals.  [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Ray Harkins Leave a Comment

The Shop-Floor Guide to DPPM vs. DPMO

The Shop-Floor Guide to DPPM vs. DPMO

In conversations about “Six Sigma level” performance, I hear people using DPPM and DPMO like they’re the same thing. And in fact, they’re close, but not interchangeable. Among manufacturing quality professionals though, this distinction matters critically when describing how good (or how bad) a process really is.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

Design Change Implementation

Design Change Implementation

After conducting a thorough root cause analysis and identifying the underlying issues behind a problem, the next critical step is developing and implementing effective solutions. However, this process requires careful planning and consideration of various factors to ensure the solution addresses the root cause and can be successfully deployed. This article explores key considerations when implementing solutions, particularly for products already in the field.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

How to Adopt World Class Maintenance

How to Adopt World Class Maintenance

Guest Post by Bill Pomfret (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

This article will be providing “World Class Maintenance” Best Practices.  As I write this article, I like to ask what people are saying about this topic.

Best Maintenance Repair Practices

Several surveys conducted in industries throughout the world have found that 70% of equipment failures are self-induced. Maintenance personnel who are not following what is termed ‘Best Maintenance Repair Practices’ substantially affect these failures. Between 30% and 50% of the self-induced failures are the result of maintenance personnel not knowing the basics of maintenance.

Maintenance personnel who, although skilled, choose not to follow best maintenance repair practices, potentially cause another 20% to 30% of those failures. The existence of this problem has been further validated through the skills assessment process performed in companies throughout the world. This program evaluated the knowledge of basic maintenance fundamentals through a combination of written, identification and performance assessments of thousands of maintenance personnel from a wide variety of industries.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

by James Reyes-Picknell Leave a Comment

Should We Outsource

Should We Outsource

Outsourcing is a form of alternative service delivery where one company hires another to perform some of its functions. It’s fairly common in some fields, such as accounting, manufacturing, human resources, procurement, and IT, but not as common when it comes to maintenance and asset management. It has its advantages and risks and must be approached carefully.

In July/Aug 2014, we authored an article on outsourcing in PEM magazine (now MRO Magazine). Although outsourcing isn’t yet as popular in North America, as elsewhere, it is increasingly being seen as an option. Here are a number of considerations to make when considering outsourcing or contracting services.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Conscious Asset, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Work Quality Assurance with ACE 3T Standard Operating Procedures

Work Quality Assurance with ACE 3T Standard Operating Procedures

Accuracy Controlled Standard Operating Procedures Use The 3T’s – Target, Tolerance, Test – For Work Quality Assurance

Assure production and maintenance work quality with accuracy controlled standard operating procedures containing 3t precision work instructions where work is done right-first-time, every time

—

An Accuracy Controlled Enterprise (ACE) is focused on getting things ‘right first time’. The quality focus in an ACE is about doing a job, every job, masterly, whether done on the shop floor or in the boardroom. That is achieved with accuracy controlled standard operating procedures in which every task is proven to be completed accurately before continuing to the next task. It is about being a master of what you do so you deliver world-class results in your work. You can read about being an ACE in the white paper The Accuracy Controlled Enterprise.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 271
  • Next Page »

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • RAM Analysis: The Sweet Spot of Systems Engineering
  • How to Choose Performance Indicators That Actually Drive Success
  • Failure Happens – It Is What Happens Next That Matters
  • R99 vs. 1 ppm
  •  Developing Maintenance Strategy for a Sheet of Paper 

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.