Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

Gemba for Product Design Engineering

If you have quality friends, you may have heard of Gemba. What is Gemba and can it help with product design?

Gemba is an ideology.

And, yes, it can help with product design!

We explore how and talk about why you might want to adopt the term “Gemba” for product design engineering.

 

View the Episode Transcript

“Go to the actual place” where customers will be using your product, where it will be manufactured, and where it will be tested.

There are really two parts to the Gemba ideology:

  1. actively go to where it’s happening to observe and talk to others
    take a partnership attitude with you when you do
  2. For design engineers making decisions about components, specs, and tolerances, these downstream activities could be thought of as your internal customers.

Adopt the term “Gemba” or “Gemba Walk” to tag it in your memory as an ideology you can adopt when designing quality products others love, for less.

Citations:

Another resource about Gemba Walks:

www.leansixsigmadefinition.com/glossary/gemba/

 

Other QDD episodes that explore these ideas more:

How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

Internal Customers vs. External Customers

 

Episode Transcript

If you have quality friends, you may have heard of Gemba. What is Gemba? And can it help with product design? Gemba is an ideology and yes, it can help with product design more after this brief introduction.

Hello, and welcome to Quality during Design the place to use quality thinking to create products others love for less. My name is Dianna. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join the conversation at qualityduringdesign.com.

Gemba is a Japanese word with a literal translation that means, “the actual place”. Gemba is just one part of the Lean principles of quality. For a lean practitioner, Gemba embodies the idea that you need to actually go to the place where things are happening in order to identify areas for continuous improvement or problems that need to be solved for a manufacturing process. A lean practitioner may take a Gemba Walk, where they go to the place where the manufacturing process is, where the parts are being made. They talk to people. They talk to the manufacturing operators and they may talk to the inspectors. How’s it going? Are you having any problems? Are you experiencing difficulty doing this? And they also just observe how things are done, how parts are moved, how they’re assembled. And they look for those areas where they can make improvements.

Continuous improvement are those little tweaks and efforts that make things better a little bit at a time. And over time can have a big impact on lots of things: throughput, the bottom line operator happiness and so on. And like I mentioned, gemba is really part of lean. So it has its roots in manufacturing, but has expanded into other areas too, like hospitals for their systems and service areas (just as one example).

Gemba is surprisingly not listed in the quality management books I have on my bookshelf. I don’t know if that’s a reflection of me or maybe the books that I have on my shelf. Maybe it’s just assumed practice, but when you’re dealing with a thought implementation system, like Lean, it’s good to call out the people management aspect.

Giving a complex idea a name like Gemba is useful to help people remember to incorporate it in their daily activities and in their planning. It’s an important part of being part of a team, a manager, and a good leader. And it’s important, too, if you’re a design engineer, making choices that affect the downstream operations.

I did Gemba Walks before I even knew of the term. Call it curiosity or being nosy, if there was something going on with a project that I was involved with, I wanted to be there. They’re starting to make prototypes in the lab. Let’s go see what’s happening. Are they able to follow the procedures like we drafted them or are they making tweaks to the process to make things easier, better for them to make the product?

As a design engineer, you can also use the Gemba ideology for your own information and purposes. At some point, you’ve got a question about how a customer would do something with your new product. Would they hold it this way or use it for other purposes, arrange with your marketing or your commercial operations person, a visit with your customer and go to where the action is. Take a Gemba Walk with your customer, take your prototype or your drawings, or go to where they would use your product and see how they’re using other products. And look at their environment. Go to their actual place, ask questions, observe, and you learn a whole lot more than if you were just watching videos or making phone calls behind your desk.

Or maybe you’re specing out a new subsystem from a supplier. Your company already has relationship with. Maybe your company audits its suppliers, and maybe they have that supplier on their schedule. I don’t know if they would let you go with them, but it wouldn’t hurt to ask. Or you can talk with a supplier management person and ask about their experiences with other projects for this company. Maybe they can set up a meeting or a tour where you actually go to the place where your products are going to be made.

Or if you’re starting to write protocols for tests, for design V and V, and you’re thinking that you’re going to be doing a tensile test for something, go to the lab and talk to the lab technicians and the people that are operating the test equipment. Maybe take a part with you or a drawing of part. What are some of the problems that they could foresee with testing your product? Would it need to be held and fixtured in a certain way? Do they have those kind of fixtures or do you need to create something new, a new tool for them to be able to test your product? Or maybe they have an idea of a different way to test that would be easier for them and give you better results. Again, take a Gemba Walk to the test lab, to the actual place where it will be tested. Observe what’s there, how the part would be handled and talk to the people that would be handling it.

Actually going to the place where things are happening is one aspect of Gemba. The other is the attitude that we take toward the whole process. The other people that we’re talking to, the operators, the customers, the test technicians, they’re all partners in creating a quality product. As design engineers, we may take a Gemba walk into the test facility and into the manufacturing facility. And even though we are designing the tolerances and determining the specs, and what’s going to be inspected, the operators, the quality inspectors, the test technicians, they’re all are internal customers, and we can succeed better if we work together.

What’s today’s insight to action? Even though Gemba is an ideology, it’s a useful one and we can identify the ideology and keep it in mind by labeling it Gemba or Gemba Walk. It’s roots are in quality, but it has several uses for design engineering that could benefit your design and you!

Please go to my website at qualityduringdesign.com. You can visit me there. And it also has a catalog of resources, including all the podcasts and their transcripts. Use the subscribe forms to join the weekly newsletter, where I share more insights and links in your podcast app. Make sure you subscribe or follow quality during design to get all the episodes and get notified when new ones are posted. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening!

 

Filed Under: Quality during Design

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Recent Episodes

QDD 102 Get Design Inputs with Flowcharts

QDD 101 Quality Tools are Legos of Development (and Their 7 Uses)

QDD 100 Lessons Learned from Coffee Pod Stories

QDD 099 Crucial Conversations in Engineering, with Shere Tuckey (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 098 Challenges Getting Team Input in Concept Development

QDD 097 Brainstorming within Design Sprints

QDD 096 After the ‘Storm: Compare and Prioritize Ideas

QDD 095 After the ‘Storm: Pareto Voting and Screening Methods

QDD 094 After the ‘Storm: Group and Explore Ideas

QDD 093 Product Design with Brainstorming, with Emily Haidemenos (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 092 Ways to Gather Ideas with a Team

QDD 091 The Spirits of Technical Writing Past, Present, and Future

QDD 090 The Gifts Others Bring

QDD 089 Next Steps after Surprising Test Results

QDD 088 Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

QDD 086 Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development

QDD 085 Book Cast

QDD 084 Engineering in the Color Economy

QDD 083 Getting to Great Designs

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

QDD 081 Variable Relationships: Correlation and Causation

QDD 080 Use Meetings to Add Productivity

QDD 079 Ways to Partner with Test Engineers

QDD 078 What do We do with FMEA Early in Design Concept?

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

QDD 076 Use Force Field Analysis to Understand Nuances

QDD 075 Getting Use Information without a Prototype

QDD 074 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Supplements Test

QDD 073 2 Lessons about Remote Work for Design Engineers

QDD 072 Always Plot the Data

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

QDD 070 Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing

QDD 069 Use FMEA to Choose Critical Design Features

QDD 068 Get Unstuck: Expand and Contract Our Problem

QDD 067 Get Unstuck: Reframe our Problem

QDD 066 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 065 Prioritizing Technical Requirements with a House of Quality

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

QDD 063 Product Design from a Data Professional Viewpoint, with Gabor Szabo (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 062 How Does Reliability Engineering Affect (Not Just Assess) Design?

QDD 061 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 060 3 Tips for Planning Design Reviews

QDD 059 Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 058 UFMEA vs. DFMEA

QDD 057 Design Input & Specs vs. Test & Measure Capability

QDD 056 ALT vs. HALT

QDD 055 Quality as a Strategic Asset vs. Quality as a Control

QDD 054 Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

QDD 053 Internal Customers vs. External Customers

QDD 052 Discrete Data vs. Continuous Data

QDD 051 Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

QDD 050 Try this Method to Help with Complex Decisions (DMRCS)

QDD 049 Overlapping Ideas: Quality, Reliability, and Safety

QDD 048 Using SIPOC to Get Started

QDD 047 Risk Barriers as Swiss Cheese?

QDD 046 Environmental Stress Testing for Robust Designs

QDD 045 Choosing a Confidence Level for Test using FMEA

QDD 044 Getting Started with FMEA – It All Begins with a Plan

QDD 043 How can 8D help Solve my Recurring Problem?

QDD 042 Mistake-Proofing – The Poka-Yoke of Usability

QDD 041 Getting Comfortable with using Reliability Results

QDD 040 How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

QDD 039 Choosing Quality Tools (Mind Map vs. Flowchart vs. Spaghetti Diagram)

QDD 038 The DFE Part of DFX (Design For Environment and eXcellence)

QDD 037 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 036 When to use DOE (Design of Experiments)?

QDD 035 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 034 Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 033 How Many Do We Need To Test?

QDD 032 Life Cycle Costing for Product Design Choices

QDD 031 5 Aspects of Good Reliability Goals and Requirements

QDD 030 Using Failure Rate Functions to Drive Early Design Decisions

QDD 029 Types of Design Analyses possible with User Process Flowcharts

QDD 028 Design Tolerances Based on Economics (Using the Taguchi Loss Function)

QDD 027 How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

QDD 026 Solving Symptoms Instead of Causes?

QDD 025 Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

QDD 024 Why Look to Standards

QDD 023 Getting the Voice of the Customer

QDD 022 The Way We Test Matters

QDD 021 Designing Specs for QA

QDD 020 Every Failure is a Gift

QDD 019 Understanding the Purposes behind Kaizen

QDD 018 Fishbone Diagram: A Supertool to Understand Problems, Potential Solutions, and Goals

QDD 017 What is ‘Production Equivalent’ and Why Does it Matter?

QDD 016 About Visual Quality Standards

QDD 015 Using the Pareto Principle and Avoiding Common Pitfalls

QDD 014 The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

QDD 013 When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 012 What are TQM, QFD, Six Sigma, and Lean?

QDD 011 The Designer’s Important Influence on Monitoring After Launch

QDD 010 How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 009 About Using Slide Decks for Technical Design Reviews

QDD 008 Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds.

QDD 007 Need to innovate? Stop brainstorming and try a systematic approach.

QDD 006 HALT! Watch out for that weakest link

QDD 005 The Designer’s Risk Analysis affects Business, Projects, and Suppliers

QDD 004 A big failure and too many causes? Try this analysis.

QDD 003 Why Your Design Inputs Need to Include Quality & Reliability

QDD 002 My product works. Why don’t they want it?

QDD 001 How to Choose the Right Improvement Model

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.