Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

We can develop a severity rating scale based on us: our company, our customer, our product… And we can relate the categories that we use to the quality dimensions that matter to us.

We talk about the 7 principal quality dimensions of goods and services, the 5 principal dimensions of quality in customer service, and how we might customize our severity scale based on these dimensions.

 

View the Episode Transcript

CHECK ON IT: We need to be careful to comply with our own company’s policies and industry’s regulations. We may not be able to customize our severity scale because of these reasons.

The 7 principal Quality Dimensions of goods and services (Garvin):

  • Aesthetics
  • Features
  • Performance (i.e. functionality of primary operating characteristics)
  • Serviceability (able to be repaired)
  • Durability
  • Reliability
  • Conformance

The 5 principal Quality Dimensions that contribute to customer perceptions of quality of a company’s services (Evans):

  • Tangibles
  • Empathy
  • Responsiveness
  • Reliability
  • Assurance

We can create a severity scale that matter to us based on these Quality Dimensions, like the example, below.

When we’re defining our severity scale with our team, we need to make sure that we use it with intention during product development, including the concept phase. And that we understand how the scale was applied so that when we’re making decisions about our product’s design and our project, we’re making informed decisions.

 

Other episodes you might like:

5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds

Citations:

Evans, James R. and William M. Lindsay. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence, 11th ed. Cengage Learning, Inc., 2020, p.103-104.

Garvin, David A. “What Does Product Quality Really Mean?” Sloan Management Review, vol. 26, no. 1, 1984, p. 25-43.

 

Episode Transcript

We may be at the concept phase of our product development, and we’re starting to evaluate some characteristics and features of our concept ideas. We may want to start categorizing them. One of the ways we can do that is by evaluating the risk – specifically the severity: if this goes wrong, or if this feature is missing, how severe is it? How would we rate that with respect to the other things that we’re looking at?

We want to be able to get some priority over all of our ideas. What severity rating scale should you use? In this particular instance, we would want to look at both the customer’s perceptions and experiences and also the functionality of our product. There’s a way we can create a severity scale that is categorical and based on quality dimensions. There are seven principal quality dimensions of goods and services, and five principal quality dimensions that contribute to customer perceptions of quality of a company’s service. These are all the dimensions of quality that our product could have. Let’s get into this a little bit more after the brief introduction.

Hello, and welcome to Quality during Design, the place to use quality thinking to create products others love for less. My name is Dianna. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join the conversation at qualityduringdesign.com.

David Garvin suggested that products have multiple dimensions of quality and he listed seven principal quality dimensions of goods and services, and they go as follows: aesthetics, features, performance (or functionality of primary operating characteristics), serviceability (or the ability to also be repaired), durability, reliability, and conformance.

When we create a product, there’s the physical product itself, but it is also tied back to the customer’s perception of the product as it relates to the company. And that can be affected by all the interfaces that the customer has with the company. It could be on repairs and returns, customer service, shipping and handling, and all of the other interfaces that customers have with not just our product, but our company, too. Considering quality dimensions that contribute to customer perceptions of quality would also be a good thing to do when we are developing products. The five principals that relate to customer perceptions are tangibles, empathy, responsiveness, reliability, and assurance.

For a category goal severity scale – sometimes they are listed from zero to five or zero to ten: the higher the number, the more severe, the worse the situation is. It also may not be a number, it may just be a description of low, low/medium, medium, high, and so on. When you’re developing a severity rating scale with your team, with your cross functional team, you just want to make sure that it makes sense for your product. You also may need to comply with your company’s quality standards or policies and procedures or even regulations. So, check into that too, before you start making decisions with a severity scale,.

If we’re in the early concept phases, and we’re just trying to get an idea, we can create a severity scale that would be related to the quality dimensions that we just talked about for the descriptions of the different severity levels. We can relate the customers perceptions of quality with the product quality dimensions. For example, one of our quality dimensions of our goods and services is aesthetics. And one of the quality dimensions related to our customers is a tangible experience. We could group those into one severity category, so it could read like this for the product: “The product is fully functional, but has a defect. And the aesthetics is negatively affected.” That would be the quality dimension of our product itself. On the customer side: “The customer can use the product as is with a defect, but notices it, and their tangible experience of the product is negatively affected.” Tangible experience is a quality dimension of our customer’s perception of quality. I’ll post an example of a severity rating scale that correlates customer experience and product functionality. And those categories include these quality dimensions that we’re talking about. It’ll be located on the blog for this podcast.

Something else to consider with the severity scale and its descriptors and categories is just your company’s mission and vision in general. Are you working for a company that is passionate about environmental safety? Then maybe you will want to add a column about environmental safety of your product. Are you working in an industry where it’s really important that a procedure get finished with the product that you’re using, then maybe you would want to add a column that relates to the procedure that your product is involved in and independent of the quality dimension of your product. You can customize the severity level descriptors for your product, for your company and for your particular customers.

If you use a severity scale like this, you just need to be consistent with it. Defining a severity scale is something that the team should do together before any analyses are done. If we think of risk analysis like performing a test, having the severity scale and some acceptance criteria is like having a test protocol in hand before you run the test.

The severity scale we’re talking about is for concept development. You may want to iterate on the work that you’re doing during concept development into the later steps of the product development process. You may want to consider relating your severity scale with the rating scale that you will use in other risk analyses (like FMEA) for your project.

What’s today’s insight to action? There are a lot of standard, published rating scales for severity out there and available. You’re not stuck using them. You can customize a severity scale to fit you, your company, your product, your customers… You can use categories based off of quality dimensions, like we talked about today. As long as when you’re defining your own severity scale, that you’re using it with intention during product development, including the concept phase. And that you understand how the scale was applied so that when you’re making decisions about your product and your project, you’re making informed ones.

If you like the content of this episode, visit quality during design.com, where you can subscribe to the weekly newsletter to keep in touch. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening!

 

Filed Under: Quality during Design

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Recent Episodes

QDD 101 Quality Tools are Legos of Development (and Their 7 Uses)

QDD 100 Lessons Learned from Coffee Pod Stories

QDD 099 Crucial Conversations in Engineering, with Shere Tuckey (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 098 Challenges Getting Team Input in Concept Development

QDD 097 Brainstorming within Design Sprints

QDD 096 After the ‘Storm: Compare and Prioritize Ideas

QDD 095 After the ‘Storm: Pareto Voting and Screening Methods

QDD 094 After the ‘Storm: Group and Explore Ideas

QDD 093 Product Design with Brainstorming, with Emily Haidemenos (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 092 Ways to Gather Ideas with a Team

QDD 091 The Spirits of Technical Writing Past, Present, and Future

QDD 090 The Gifts Others Bring

QDD 089 Next Steps after Surprising Test Results

QDD 088 Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

QDD 086 Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development

QDD 085 Book Cast

QDD 084 Engineering in the Color Economy

QDD 083 Getting to Great Designs

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

QDD 081 Variable Relationships: Correlation and Causation

QDD 080 Use Meetings to Add Productivity

QDD 079 Ways to Partner with Test Engineers

QDD 078 What do We do with FMEA Early in Design Concept?

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

QDD 076 Use Force Field Analysis to Understand Nuances

QDD 075 Getting Use Information without a Prototype

QDD 074 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Supplements Test

QDD 073 2 Lessons about Remote Work for Design Engineers

QDD 072 Always Plot the Data

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

QDD 070 Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing

QDD 069 Use FMEA to Choose Critical Design Features

QDD 068 Get Unstuck: Expand and Contract Our Problem

QDD 067 Get Unstuck: Reframe our Problem

QDD 066 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 065 Prioritizing Technical Requirements with a House of Quality

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

QDD 063 Product Design from a Data Professional Viewpoint, with Gabor Szabo (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 062 How Does Reliability Engineering Affect (Not Just Assess) Design?

QDD 061 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 060 3 Tips for Planning Design Reviews

QDD 059 Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 058 UFMEA vs. DFMEA

QDD 057 Design Input & Specs vs. Test & Measure Capability

QDD 056 ALT vs. HALT

QDD 055 Quality as a Strategic Asset vs. Quality as a Control

QDD 054 Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

QDD 053 Internal Customers vs. External Customers

QDD 052 Discrete Data vs. Continuous Data

QDD 051 Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

QDD 050 Try this Method to Help with Complex Decisions (DMRCS)

QDD 049 Overlapping Ideas: Quality, Reliability, and Safety

QDD 048 Using SIPOC to Get Started

QDD 047 Risk Barriers as Swiss Cheese?

QDD 046 Environmental Stress Testing for Robust Designs

QDD 045 Choosing a Confidence Level for Test using FMEA

QDD 044 Getting Started with FMEA – It All Begins with a Plan

QDD 043 How can 8D help Solve my Recurring Problem?

QDD 042 Mistake-Proofing – The Poka-Yoke of Usability

QDD 041 Getting Comfortable with using Reliability Results

QDD 040 How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

QDD 039 Choosing Quality Tools (Mind Map vs. Flowchart vs. Spaghetti Diagram)

QDD 038 The DFE Part of DFX (Design For Environment and eXcellence)

QDD 037 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 036 When to use DOE (Design of Experiments)?

QDD 035 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 034 Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 033 How Many Do We Need To Test?

QDD 032 Life Cycle Costing for Product Design Choices

QDD 031 5 Aspects of Good Reliability Goals and Requirements

QDD 030 Using Failure Rate Functions to Drive Early Design Decisions

QDD 029 Types of Design Analyses possible with User Process Flowcharts

QDD 028 Design Tolerances Based on Economics (Using the Taguchi Loss Function)

QDD 027 How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

QDD 026 Solving Symptoms Instead of Causes?

QDD 025 Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

QDD 024 Why Look to Standards

QDD 023 Getting the Voice of the Customer

QDD 022 The Way We Test Matters

QDD 021 Designing Specs for QA

QDD 020 Every Failure is a Gift

QDD 019 Understanding the Purposes behind Kaizen

QDD 018 Fishbone Diagram: A Supertool to Understand Problems, Potential Solutions, and Goals

QDD 017 What is ‘Production Equivalent’ and Why Does it Matter?

QDD 016 About Visual Quality Standards

QDD 015 Using the Pareto Principle and Avoiding Common Pitfalls

QDD 014 The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

QDD 013 When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 012 What are TQM, QFD, Six Sigma, and Lean?

QDD 011 The Designer’s Important Influence on Monitoring After Launch

QDD 010 How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 009 About Using Slide Decks for Technical Design Reviews

QDD 008 Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds.

QDD 007 Need to innovate? Stop brainstorming and try a systematic approach.

QDD 006 HALT! Watch out for that weakest link

QDD 005 The Designer’s Risk Analysis affects Business, Projects, and Suppliers

QDD 004 A big failure and too many causes? Try this analysis.

QDD 003 Why Your Design Inputs Need to Include Quality & Reliability

QDD 002 My product works. Why don’t they want it?

QDD 001 How to Choose the Right Improvement Model

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.